I was given an advanced copy (without page numbers) of this book in exchange for an honest and voluntary review on Goodreads. “Footnote” citations do not explicitly include chapter number; in actually, they are endnotes, which was somewhat aggravating, if understandable, for me. Also, I have put in boldface where I mention each chapter. Quotations are to be understood to belong to their respective chapters, unless otherwise explicitly cited. Continue reading
Check out my review over at Exegetical Tools.
In my paper for my Hermeneutical Foundations class with Dr. Poythress, I build off Poythress’ work (in the bibliography of my paper, with a freely accessible PDF document) on divine authorship and argue that it is the only robust enough foundation for stabilizing the meaning(s) of a text.
Here is the abstract: Continue reading
I just had to repost this clever and important post: “Why the Church Should Be Welcoming but Not Affirming of Straight Christians.”
This should help to subvert two deeply embedded myths in the church:
1) It subverts the idea that homosexuals are a unique “problem” to the church, but not heterosexual lust or adultery. The opposite of homosexual sin is not heterosexual lust, but purity through Christ. Straight Christians are not able to let their guard done or pity those who same sex attraction (SSA). We have to be watchful and dependent on the Holy Spirit and prayer. We are not holier or purer than those who struggle with SSA.
2) It communicates that those with same sex attraction (SSA) are not alone or unique in their call to purity / even singleness. We are all called to die to self and fight what may feel so natural. Lust and (sexual) sin are no respecters of sexual orientation or attraction. All Christians, whether single or married, straight or with SSA or …, are called to be pure and holy, as the Bride of Christ, who is Lord over all things and spheres and who claims lordship over everything.